Transalta Corporation v. Canada – FCA: Court Declines to Increase Cost Award – TCC Judge Acted Within His DiscretionPlus >
Mittal v. R. – TCC: Non-Attorney Engineer Representing Himself Not Entitled to Hourly CostsPlus >
McKenzie v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer Proposal to Allow Appeal Without Costs Not a “Settlement” OfferPlus >
Edwards v. R. – FCA: Federal Court of Appeal Reverses TCC, Adjourns Trial Because of Unenacted Charities RulesPlus >
Roper v. R. – FCA: Federal Court of Appeal Affirms Dismissal of Appeal for Failure to Comply with Costs OrderPlus >
Daishowa-Marubeni International v. R. – TCC: Taxpayer Awarded 1/6 of Actual Costs, Not 1/3 as RequestedPlus >
A&E Precision Fabricating and Machine Shop Inc. v. R. – FCA: Tax Court has no Jurisdiction over Collection MattersPlus >
Nicholls v. The Queen – Loss on a Promissory Note Payable by a Trust Not an Allowable Business Investment LossPlus >
Pilford Estate v. The Queen: Recent Supreme Court of Canada Jurisprudence Not Enough to Support a Claim for Tax Exemption under the Indian Act as Connections to Reserve Were Too SlimPlus >
Myrdan Investments Inc. v. The Queen – Taxpayers Awarded One Third of Their Out of Pocket Costs (154% of the Tarriff) Because of CRA’s IntransigencePlus >