Garfin v. R. – TCC: Lawyer’s legal assistant an employee and not an independent contractorPlus >
Enseignants de Langue Anglaise de Montréal. v. M.N.R. – TCC: Language instructors not engaged in insurable/pensionable workPlus >
3193099 Manitoba Ltd. v. R. – TCC: Worker providing oil rig services to controlled corporation was an independent contractorPlus >
Baldwin v. R. – TCC: Employment income of appellants was not situated on a reserve.Plus >
Badour v. R. – TCC: Taxi cab driver working for owner of taxi engaged in insurable/pensionable employmentPlus >
Porotti v. R. – The worker was an independent contractor for EI/CPP purposesPlus >
Grand Oak Law and Landscape v. M.N.R. – TCC: Landscape worker was an employeePlus >
Ontario Real Estate Association v. R. – TCC: Test centre operators not employeesPlus >
Saindon v. M.N.R. – TCC: Truck driver engaged in insurable and pensionable employmentPlus >
766743 Ontario Limited v. R. – TCC: Dental hygienist engaged in insurable/pensionable employmentPlus >